CATEGORIES
- (1) Negotiating Tax Debt and Payment Arrangements with SARS
- (15)Accounting
- (2)Accounting for Income Tax
- (7)Administration of Estates
- (1)Application of tax rates, s6(2) rebates
- (1)Assessed losses
- (4)Audit, Reviews & Other Services
- (9)Blogs
- (8)Capital Gains Tax
- (1)Capital Gains Tax - Individuals Tax
- (1)Capital Gains Tax Implications of Trusts
- (2)Case study: Home office expense
- (1)Case study: Travel allowances
- (1)Company Formations
- (117)Corporate Tax
- (9)Customs and Excise
- (2)Deceased Estate
- (1)Deductions Pre-trade and prepaid expenses
- (1)Deferred tax assets and deferred tax on equity
- (1)Deregistration
- (2)Employer and Employee (PAYE and UIF Specific)
- (1)Estate Duty
- (1)Events / Webinars
- (8)Faculty News
- (2)Farming
- (142)Individuals Tax
- (1)Input - Customs Duty
- (3)Interest
- (13)International Tax
- (17)Legislation
- (1)Low interest rate loans and loan subsidies
- (1)Nature of the rights of beneficiaries
- (1)Notional input tax
- (8)Payroll
- (2)Practical Payroll
- (2)Provisional tax (Link with other Taxes)
- (1)SARS Dispute Resolution
- (4)SARS Issues
- (1)Salaried Employees
- (127)Tax Administration
- (2)Tax Administration Part 2B: Resolving Problems with SARS using the Tax Ombud
- (1)Tax Administration Part 3B Dispute Resolution - Objection and appeal
- (2)Tax Update
- (2)Tax implications of loans to trusts
- (1)Tax residence
- (1)Tax returns and payments
- (1)Transfer-Pricing
- (1)Trust Income / Gain Allocations
- (1)Trust types and income allocations
- (5)Trusts
- (66)VAT
- (3)VAT periods
- (1)Wear and tear allowances
- (1)Zero Rated
- Show All
What is The Tax Faculty’s response to Mr. Engel withdrawing CPD provider accreditation on the basis of deficient institutional integrity?
- 20 March 2024
- Faculty News
- The Tax Faculty
We don’t know if Mr. Engel is aware of the deflective irony behind his claim, but it does reveal that he is either intentionally dishonest with SAIT members or is shockingly ignorant of the governance of his own organisation, most likely both in equal measure.
Mr. Engel admits on record that SAIT has no cause for concern for the high standard of CPD offered by The Tax Faculty or the quality of our lecturers. This is why his slanderous email, 14 February, cites “institutional integrity” as “one of three key factors required for SAIT CPD recognition.” It should come as no surprise that if you click on this link to read SAIT’s official CPD recognition criteria, SAIT makes no reference to "institutional integrity" as a qualifier.
In desperation, Mr. Engel has now appointed himself arbiter of ethical business practices in order to justify his refusal for more than two years to provide The Tax Faculty with the SAIT CPD provider application form. The correspondence to obtain the CPD accreditation application form can be accessed here.
Although Mr. Engel is coming to realise that the SAIT members have little appetite to continue funding his legal wranglings, the ongoing abuse of power has blinded Mr. Engel to the harm and misery he is causing the staff and members of both organisations.