CATEGORIES
- (1) Negotiating Tax Debt and Payment Arrangements with SARS
- (31)Accounting
- (2)Accounting for Income Tax
- (1)Accounting for Income Tax
- (7)Administration of Estates
- (1)Advisory Services
- (1)Application of tax rates, s6(2) rebates
- (1)Assessed losses
- (4)Audit, Reviews & Other Services
- (9)Blogs
- (8)Capital Gains Tax
- (1)Capital Gains Tax - Individuals Tax
- (1)Capital Gains Tax Implications of Trusts
- (2)Case study: Home office expense
- (1)Case study: Travel allowances
- (1)Company Formations
- (1)Compliance
- (123)Corporate Tax
- (9)Customs and Excise
- (2)Deceased Estate
- (1)Deductions Pre-trade and prepaid expenses
- (1)Deregistration
- (2)Employer and Employee (PAYE and UIF Specific)
- (1)Estate Duty
- (1)Events / Webinars
- (9)Faculty News
- (2)Farming
- (152)Individuals Tax
- (1)Input - Customs Duty
- (3)Interest
- (13)International Tax
- (17)Legislation
- (1)Low interest rate loans and loan subsidies
- (1)Nature of the rights of beneficiaries
- (1)Notional input tax
- (9)Payroll
- (2)Practical Payroll
- (2)Provisional tax (Link with other Taxes)
- (2)SARS Dispute Resolution
- (4)SARS Issues
- (1)Salaried Employees
- (134)Tax Administration
- (2)Tax Administration Part 2B: Resolving Problems with SARS using the Tax Ombud
- (1)Tax Administration Part 3B Dispute Resolution - Objection and appeal
- (3)Tax Update
- (1)Tax implications of loans to trusts
- (1)Tax residence
- (1)Tax returns and payments
- (2)Transfer-Pricing
- (1)Trust Income / Gain Allocations
- (1)Trust types and income allocations
- (6)Trusts
- (70)VAT
- (3)VAT periods
- (1)Wear and tear allowances
- (1)Wills, Estates & Trusts
- (1)Zero Rated
- (1)eFiling
- Show All
Unintended consequences of the new CFC rules
- 06 May 2020
- Corporate Tax
- Judith Becker
Wednesday, 20 September 2017
Important:
This article is based on tax law for the tax year ending 28 February 2018.
Author: Judith Becker (ENSafrica)
In the 2017 South African Budget speech, the Minister of Finance raised government’s concern that the current Controlled Foreign Company (“CFC”) rules do not capture foreign companies held by interposed trusts or foundations, and it was announced that countermeasures for the treatment of foreign companies held by trusts or foundations will be considered. Treasury, in an attempt to cover these loopholes, has introduced certain changes into the CFC legislation and a section that might have more disadvantages than Treasury intended.
Current CFC rules
South Africa imposes taxes on worldwide income of residents. The Income Tax Act, 1962 (the “Act”) contains various anti-avoidance provisions which aim to curb tax avoidance. One of these provisions was the introduction of CFC provisions contained in section 9D of the Act. The CFC rules are aimed at preventing South Africans from shifting income offshore by investing in a CFC.
A CFC is a foreign company where one or more South African residents directly or indirectly hold or exercise more than 50% of the participation or voting rights. The CFC rules make provision for the net income of a CFC to be attributed and included in the income of its South African resident shareholders. However, structures where the offshore company is being held through a foreign trust or foundation do not fall within the ambit of South African CFC rule. The profit of the foreign company therefore falls outside of the South African tax net.
This article first appeared on ensafrica.com