This article is based on tax law for the year ending 29 February 2026.
A South African service provider rendered services valued at R100,000 to a company resident in Lesotho. The Lesotho entity intends to deduct withholding tax of R15,000 and remit only the net amount of R85,000. The South African supplier seeks to receive the full contract value and handle the related tax obligations in accordance with South African tax legislation through the South African Revenue Service (SARS).
A South African service provider rendered services valued at R100,000 to a company resident in Lesotho. The Lesotho entity intends to deduct withholding tax of R15,000 and remit only the net amount of R85,000. The South African supplier seeks to receive the full contract value and handle the related tax obligations in accordance with South African tax legislation through the South African Revenue Service (SARS).
The transaction raises several interconnected tax considerations:
Income Tax Act 58 of 1962:
South Africa–Lesotho Double Taxation Agreement:
Immediate Relief Options:
Certificate of Tax Residency
The South African supplier should obtain a tax residency certificate from SARS. This certificate can be submitted to the Lesotho authorities to claim treaty benefits, including any applicable reduced withholding tax rates under the DTA.
Advance Ruling from SARS
In terms of sections 92 to 95 of the Tax Administration Act, the company may apply for an advance tax ruling to confirm the tax treatment of the transaction and the extent of relief available under South African tax law.
Engagement with Lesotho Tax Authorities
The supplier should engage directly with the Lesotho tax authorities to understand and comply with their procedures for claiming a withholding tax exemption or reduction under the DTA.
Section 6quat Relief Considerations:
While section 6quat permits a foreign tax credit, it is limited to the lower of the foreign tax paid or the South African tax payable on the same income. In this case, assuming a 15% withholding tax in Lesotho and a 27% corporate tax rate in South Africa, the credit would be limited to 15% of the taxable portion of the relevant income. Documentation must be retained to substantiate the foreign tax paid and its link to the South African taxable income.
The optimal resolution requires early engagement with both SARS and the Lesotho tax authorities, supported by formal documentation to assert treaty entitlements. Relying solely on section 6quat relief after the fact may not provide full economic protection, especially if the foreign tax credit is limited. A pre-emptive, well-documented approach is recommended to ensure the South African supplier receives the gross payment and complies with both jurisdictions’ tax obligations.