CATEGORIES
- (1) Negotiating Tax Debt and Payment Arrangements with SARS
- (31)Accounting
- (2)Accounting for Income Tax
- (1)Accounting for Income Tax
- (7)Administration of Estates
- (1)Advisory Services
- (1)Application of tax rates, s6(2) rebates
- (1)Assessed losses
- (4)Audit, Reviews & Other Services
- (9)Blogs
- (8)Capital Gains Tax
- (1)Capital Gains Tax - Individuals Tax
- (1)Capital Gains Tax Implications of Trusts
- (2)Case study: Home office expense
- (1)Case study: Travel allowances
- (1)Company Formations
- (1)Compliance
- (123)Corporate Tax
- (9)Customs and Excise
- (2)Deceased Estate
- (1)Deductions Pre-trade and prepaid expenses
- (1)Deregistration
- (2)Employer and Employee (PAYE and UIF Specific)
- (1)Estate Duty
- (1)Events / Webinars
- (9)Faculty News
- (2)Farming
- (152)Individuals Tax
- (1)Input - Customs Duty
- (3)Interest
- (13)International Tax
- (17)Legislation
- (1)Low interest rate loans and loan subsidies
- (1)Nature of the rights of beneficiaries
- (1)Notional input tax
- (9)Payroll
- (2)Practical Payroll
- (2)Provisional tax (Link with other Taxes)
- (2)SARS Dispute Resolution
- (4)SARS Issues
- (1)Salaried Employees
- (134)Tax Administration
- (2)Tax Administration Part 2B: Resolving Problems with SARS using the Tax Ombud
- (1)Tax Administration Part 3B Dispute Resolution - Objection and appeal
- (3)Tax Update
- (1)Tax implications of loans to trusts
- (1)Tax residence
- (1)Tax returns and payments
- (2)Transfer-Pricing
- (1)Trust Income / Gain Allocations
- (1)Trust types and income allocations
- (6)Trusts
- (70)VAT
- (3)VAT periods
- (1)Wear and tear allowances
- (1)Wills, Estates & Trusts
- (1)Zero Rated
- (1)eFiling
- Show All
Controlled foreign company comparable tax threshold to be decreased
- 19 December 2019
- Corporate Tax
- Tsangadzaome Mukumba
Monday, 08 April 2019
Important:
This article is based on tax law for the tax year ending 28 February 2020.
Author: Tsangadzaome Mukumba (Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr for International Law Office)
The 2019 Budget noted that a global downward trend in corporate taxation rates may lead to an unintended increase in the imputation of controlled foreign companies' (CFCs') net income in South African shareholders' taxable income. This could occur despite the fact that at its inception, a CFC has operated in a jurisdiction with tax rates which met the present threshold currently contained in Paragraph (i) of the proviso to Section 9D(2A)(l) of the Income Tax Act.
The proviso currently deems a CFC's net income to be nil where the tax payable in the foreign jurisdiction amounts to 75% of the normal tax which the company would have paid in South Africa. In the event that the so-called 'high-tax' exemption applies, no CFC income is imputed to the South African shareholder.
The budget proposes a reduction in the threshold to less than 75%. This would avoid the situation where a taxpayer, who had set up a CFC under the assumption that the high-tax exemption applied is now subject to South African income tax based on the foreign jurisdiction's tax policy changes.
The budget also notes that this reduction must consider the risks to the tax base. This risk lies in a broader range of jurisdictions falling within the new lower threshold, thereby reducing the tax base. South African taxpayers may even seek out these jurisdictions and interpose a company in a jurisdiction which has favourable tax rates and trap income there, to the detriment of the South African fiscus.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer.
ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.
This article first appeared on internationallawoffice.com