CATEGORIES
- (47)Accounting & Financial Reporting
- (1)Accounting for Income Tax
- (1)Application of tax rates, s6(2) rebates
- (1)Assessed losses
- (10)Blogs
- (1)Business Advisory
- (8)Capital Gains Tax
- (1)Capital Gains Tax - Individuals Tax
- (1)Capital Gains Tax Implications of Trusts
- (2)Case study: Home office expense
- (1)Case study: Travel allowances
- (1)Company Formations
- (136)Corporate Tax
- (10)Customs and Excise
- (2)Deceased Estate
- (1)Deductions Pre-trade and prepaid expenses
- (1)Deregistration
- (2)Employer and Employee (PAYE and UIF Specific)
- (1)Estate Duty
- (1)Events / Webinars
- (11)Faculty News
- (2)Farming
- (168)Individuals Tax
- (1)Input - Customs Duty
- (3)Interest
- (18)International Tax
- (1)Nature of the rights of beneficiaries
- (1)Notional input tax
- (9)Payroll
- (2)Practical Payroll
- (2)Provisional tax (Link with other Taxes)
- (4)SARS Issues
- (156)Tax Administration
- (2)Tax Administration Part 2B: Resolving Problems with SARS using the Tax Ombud
- (1)Tax Administration Part 3B Dispute Resolution - Objection and appeal
- (3)Tax Dispute Resolution
- (1)Tax Opinions
- (3)Tax Update
- (1)Tax implications of loans to trusts
- (1)Tax residence
- (1)Tax returns and payments
- (3)Transfer-Pricing
- (1)Trust Income / Gain Allocations
- (1)Trust types and income allocations
- (10)Trusts
- (84)VAT
- (3)VAT periods
- (1)Wear and tear allowances
- (13)Wills, Estates & Succession
- (1)Zero Rated
- (2)eFiling
- Show All
Tax implications resulting from the elimination of intra-group loans - BPR346
- 17 July 2020
- SARS
Important:
This binding private ruling is valid for a period of one year from 12 March 2020.
1. Summary
This ruling determines the income tax and dividends tax consequences of the redemption of intra-group loans by way of set-off against dividends payable.
2. Relevant tax laws
In this ruling references to sections are to sections of the Act applicable as at 11 March 2020. Unless the context indicates otherwise any word or expression in this ruling bears the meaning ascribed to it in the Act.
This is a ruling on the interpretation and application of –
- section 19; and
- section 64F(1)(a).
3. Parties to the proposed transaction
The below-mentioned companies belong to the same group of companies as defined in section 41(1).
The applicant: A private company and a resident
Co-applicant A: A private company and a resident
Co-applicant B: A private company and a resident
Co-applicant C: A private company and a resident
4. Description of the proposed transaction
The applicant is an investment holding company. It owns all the equity shares in co-applicant A and co-applicant B.
Co-applicant B holds 100% of the share capital of co-applicant C.
The following loan accounts exist between the applicants –
• loan 1 receivable by co-applicant A from the applicant;
• loan 2 receivable by co-applicant A from co-applicant B;
• loan 3 receivable by co-applicant C from the applicant;
• loan 4 receivable by co-applicant C from co-applicant A; and
• loan 5 receivable by co-applicant B from the applicant.
The loans arose from ongoing advances by the group companies to one another to fund operations within the group. None of the funds were used to fund the acquisition of assets. The loans were used to fund the day-to-day operations of the group companies.
The group wishes to eliminate the intra-group loans as far as possible. The steps to implement the proposed transactions are as follows:
Step 1
- Co-applicant A will declare a dividend to the applicant equal to the balance of loan 1, which will be left outstanding on loan account.
- Co-applicant A and the applicant will agree to set off the dividend payable by co-applicant A against loan 1 payable by the applicant to co-applicant A, resulting in the full settlement of both loans.
Step 2
- Co-applicant C will declare a dividend to co-applicant B equal to the balance owing in respect of loan 3, which will be left outstanding on loan account. Co-applicant C will cede loan 3 to co-applicant B in settlement of the dividend.
- Co-applicant B will cede loan 3 and loan 5 to co-applicant A in part payment of loan 2.
Step 3
- Co-applicant C will declare a dividend to co-applicant B for an amount equal to the balance in respect of loan 4, which will be left outstanding on loan account. Co-applicant C will cede loan 4 to co-applicant B in settlement of the dividend.
- Loan 2 and loan 4 will be set-off against each other. The net balance will be an amount owing by co-applicant B to co-applicant A in respect of loan 2.
Step 4
- Co-applicant A will declare a dividend to the applicant for an amount equal to the sum of the balances of loan 2, 3 and 5, which will be left outstanding on loan account.
- Loan 3 and loan 5 will be set off against the dividend.
- Co-applicant A will cede loan 2 to the applicant in settlement of the dividend.
5. Conditions and assumptions
This binding private ruling is not subject to any additional conditions and assumptions.
6. Ruling
The ruling made in connection with the proposed transaction is as follows:
a) The dividend to be declared by co-applicant A, which equals the amount owed by virtue of loan 1 by the applicant, will be exempt from dividends tax under section 64F(1)(a).
b) The dividends to be declared by co-applicant C in steps 2 and 3 will be exempt from dividends tax under section 64F(1)(a).
Please click here to read more.
This article first appeared on sars.gov.za.
Webinar Commentary
For an update on the latest legislative amendments and court rulings access our Monthly Tax Update webinar-on-demand presented by Prof Jackie Arendse here.